« REAL myn eat REAL tacos | Main | eating liberally »
September 29, 2005
If smoke, then fire.
Following a week of LSAT practice tests, this is the only entry that my mushy mind is capable of rendering:Assuming the title is true, which of the following would logically follow?
a) Smoke is always present for there to be a fire.
b) If there is smoke, then there is most likely a fire that caused it.
c) If there is no fire, then there does not have to be smoke.
d) Smoke is necessary for there to be fire.
e) Smoke is sufficient for there to be fire.
Posted by rxu at September 29, 2005 12:37 AM